Hannah Silva and Thomas John Bacon share their views on theatre criticism in the region.
Foreword by Pamela Peter-Agbia.
Originally published in Nom de Strip, Issue 2 / Right here, Right Now.

Last month we thought we’d flex our social media muscles and invite the internet to respond to this question. We were expecting, at best, a couple of re-tweets from our semi-interested friends, or unhelpful one-word replies like ‘dunno’. The thoughtful considered responses we received from theatre maker Hannah Silva and performance artist Thomas John Bacon were kind of unexpected, but they reveal a genuine concern about the perceived lack of serious theatre criticism in the region. So, why aren’t people writing about theatre in the South West? This question refers to both the lack of reviews of work produced locally and the lack of theatre critics based in the region. Our original thoughts were that theatre, for some reason, neither good nor bad, seems distant to the rest of the arts. We feel less likely to stumble upon a review of a theatre production or live performance than we are an art exhibition or music gig. Theatre criticism is out there, but it’s written for and by those who are already firmly part of that world, it flies over the heads of those who don’t speak the language. And with the region being so damn big and disparate the few people writing about theatre in the region are often required to be in two to four places at the same time. But, of course they can’t be, and so good work often misses out on good criticism. Thanks to Hannah and Thomas for the following contributions, which offer more insight into the issue than we ever could.
Hannah Silva,
Writer & Theatre Maker, Plymouth
There are a few South West reviewers and writers – Belinda Dillon has reviewed for Devon Life for a while, and she now reviews for the brilliant Exeunt magazine. I check out these blogs now and then: Angela Street, Annette Chown and Wide Awake Devon, who are good at provoking debates, and Theatre Writing South West, which has just started a blog. Action Hero asks good questions, and I think in Bristol in general there’s loads going on. But sometimes Bristol doesn’t feel like the ‘South West’.
Lyn Gardner regularly gets down to the Drum Theatre in Plymouth for The Guardian. Elizabeth Mahoney has been reviewing lots of stuff for The Guardian in the northern part of the region (and Wales) … and gives a very high proportion of four and five-star reviews!
When I tell people I live in Plymouth they often suggest that I enjoy the whole ‘big fish in a small pond’ phenomenon. Actually I feel like a tadpole without a pond at all.
I invited everyone I could think of in the region and outside of it to the premiere of Opposition at the Barbican Theatre in Plymouth last year. It was sold out, but only those outside of Plymouth who already knew my work came, and there were no reviews. When it was at the Bike Shed Theatre, for the Exeter Fringe Festival, Belinda Dillon came and wrote a lovely review for Devon Life. That was the first proper review of my work in the region.

Hannah Silva, Opposition.
So because I couldn’t get any national critics to come to see Opposition in the region, or any producers or representatives from other theatres either, going to the Edinburgh Fringe (with the Barbican Theatre) seemed like it’d provide that opportunity. I got great reviews in Edinburgh. Those reviews really helped me to book other tours. However, the nationals didn’t make it. It was a little frustrating to see The Guardian reviewing work that had already been on in London or was going to be in London in the following weeks, but not managing to come to mine – when the future of my show kind of depended on getting those reviews.
The Edinburgh Fringe is a nightmare and way too big to stand out if you’re not known and don’t have a known producer/theatre behind you. One of the people who did manage to come was Phil Hindson from the Arts Council (funny that I had to go all the way to Edinburgh to get my local relationship manager to see my work; but it turned out well). Following Edinburgh I managed to get a second small Grants for the Arts fund to redevelop the show.
It’s possible that if I’d had a review from one of those nationals, I’d have managed to book Opposition for a run at a London theatre by now. Someone recently said, if you’d had a load of four-star reviews from Edinburgh it would have been programmed in London – which made me go ‘Arrrggh but I did!!’ – just not from The Guardian. So I’ve now put all the stars in a more prominent position on my blog.
At the recent ‘Getting it out there’ symposium, Lyn Gardner said that theatre makers should stop worrying about the mainstream press and instead pursue a dialogue with bloggers, etc. I like the point, and I think in London where there is plenty of opportunity to connect with great bloggers and online websites and other theatre makers it is total sense. But we can’t expect them to travel this far without funding, and in the South West we don’t have that kind of a community. We need to start building one.
I’m not a critic, or reviewer, or anything. I realised a while ago that it wasn’t sensible for me to attempt to review work – because I’m an artist too, and we’re colleagues in a way. I can be mega-blunt and I rarely like stuff. So I made a little rule – I’ll only write about companies that are established, so what I write has no impact on them, or, I’ll just write about the work that I think needs shouting about.
So I saw Blok/Eko by Howard Barker at the Northcott Theatre in Exeter. I didn’t go intending to write about it, not at all. But when I got home and looked it up there were no reviews. So I wrote my kind of a response and a lot of people have read it. Actually the comments are more interesting than my post, and I’m happy that my blog provided a space for people to discuss the work. I don’t know why there were no ‘proper’ reviews of Blok/Eko.
Thomas John Bacon,
Writer and Performance Artist, Bristol
Aren’t people writing about performance in the South West? I am a live artist, PhD researcher and critic for an online and print based periodical. I am a Londoner who has found himself in the South West for the past four years or so and in that time I’ve lived in two distinctly different cities and one town: Gloucester, Cheltenham and Bristol, where I currently live. The publication I write for covers theatre, performance, live art, experimental action and dance, anywhere and everywhere. For the past year since I have been with them I have had a remit to cover performances both in Bristol and Bath. They have an ethos to write with integrity and thoughtful insight and they are always open to hearing from new writers who may be able to report from under-represented areas of the country.
In each of these communities, performance, mainly in the form of theatre, can be found to be already written about. For the most part this will only ever be found in local newspapers; perhaps a review or possibly a mini-feature if it happens to involve a community event, school or charity. This is not however a syndrome peculiar to the South West but rather a dysfunction of the system as a whole. This sort of meagre coverage that does exist is of vital importance and shouldn’t be put down, but it could do more. Rarely will it truly engage with the work and more often than not it can be found to celebrate the poorest of pieces as it has a duty to support that local economy.
On the flip side to the argument, however, we must also look to the producers, venues and curators. Most are driven solely by economic constraints, and therefore, when one steps outside of a city, programmes become tedious and repetitive, dominated by touring ‘safe’ rep. Again one can understand the reasons, but this is not the sort of performance that will receive coverage at a higher/wider national level. These venues, that struggle to survive in ever more difficult climates, such as witnessed in the Somerset arts cuts, should however take a risk every now and again. The safe choice isn’t always the right choice, though it can be understood. The Parabola Arts Centre in Cheltenham that forms part of the exclusive Ladies College has dared to take unprecedented chances in their recent programme, far more than has ever been done in any of the local theatres of the same area. Though one could argue that they can afford to, let us then look to the Stroud annual Site Festival that has successfully brought rare and exciting live art to a rural setting. But when was the last time you read about the programme at The Everyman Cheltenham or Gloucester Guildhall in a national periodical?

Thomas John Bacon, {RE}authoring through sacrifice. Photo Julia Bauer.
In Bristol, the programmes are mixed and varied, and the main venues such as Tobacco Factory Theatre, Arnolfini and the Old Vic work hard as cultural hubs to propagate and propel excitingly varied programmes. But even here, in the thrust of ‘cultural-strategy’, festivals, pop-up venues, communities and smaller locations, you can still find it hard to discover the more extreme end of live art, and in my limited experience – having only lived here a year – I have encountered censorship from a Bristol venue (not named here) that forced me to choose to relocate a programme I had curated to London. The details of these events have already been eloquently covered by Artsadmin’s Manick Govinda in an article he wrote for Spiked, and I only mention this again now as, being the first venue that bravely stepped forward to rehost our work, it was not from the South West but instead ]performance s p a c e [ in London. And indeed I have found that due to its content my own solo work is more likely to be programmed in the major arts cities such as London, Glasgow and Leeds than sadly in the South West.
When work is shown we should write about it somewhere. Not every piece will always be covered but the act of writing is an important and vital document.
It helps to promote, push, celebrate, critique and archive.
When work is shown we should write about it somewhere. Not every piece will always be covered but the act of writing is an important and vital document. It helps to promote, push, celebrate, critique and archive. Any form of writing is important, from bloggers to academics, from hacks to informed critics, they all serve a purpose. The South West has an amazing mix of art that is home-grown, transient and international; producers, venues and curators must take risks alongside their normal remit, be that an artistic strategy or economic constraint, in order to forge forward. Sometimes success will be found and at other times failure, both are of equal importance but the hosts of new work will only ever be encouraged to take risks if writers support, contextualise or capture the event. There needs to be an evolving reciprocity between both sides of the sector, especially where current representation appears to be poorer.
There could always be more done to host or write but these questions are not unique to the South West. Not everything will be published, not everything will be promoted and not everything will be celebrated, and many things will be missed, but this is part of life in any big city and so the South West – rural and urban – will be no different. What can be done centres around risk. Risk is always important. And if the South West is seen to do more, in the same way that Parabola or Site have, then this will naturally capture wider national coverage from specialist arts publications and academics. In 2010 Plymouth Arts Centre hosted the successful and celebrated live art event Pigs of Today are the Hams of Tomorrow, but this was attached to the internationally established name of Marina Abramovic. We need to support and grow our own new ‘names’ now, not wait for them to come to the South West to create a context in which risk becomes safe. The ultimate question isn’t one of why is there a lack of writing, but what can we do to evolve the sector for the benefit of all?
NB
Hannah Silva: hannahsilva.co.uk
Thomas John Bacon: thomasjohnbacon.com



To pick up on Hannah’s point about needing to build a regional online critics’ community in the SW, county dance agency Dance in Devon made some in-roads with this a few years back, when they started a young (18-30) dance reviewing scheme. While there’s perhaps no need for an age restriction, the aims of the scheme had real merit: to provide opportunities for dance practitioners to get experience of critical writing and to dance companies performing in Devon to have their work reviewed. This was supported by arts organisations across the county (including Dartington, for whom I work) who provided comps to the performances for young reviewers. In the case of DiD’s scheme at Dartington, this also led to opportunities to bring dance discussion and criticism onto the air waves via Dartington-based community station, Soundart Radio (also providing radio producing experience to local dance performers/students!)
Something similar (not age limited) also exists with the wesbite Devon & Cornwall Film.
Could this be replicated in the theatre sector, perhaps hosted by an organisation such as http://theatredevon.net/? Woud it help?
Hello Hannah & Thomas. Thanks for the intelligent and insightful thoughts. Really enjoyed reading your thoughts and I have strong feelings about a lot of the issues you have raised. We try hard to take risks with the programme – but we have only ever had someone from the Gloucestershire Echo through our doors. We have had name checks in nationals, but not a visit yet! We are hoping to talk about some of the issues you have raised at a gathering in September called ‘Risking Together: enabling creative risk-taking in the regions’. I think a lack of strong writing is part of our challenge in creating a regional identity and attracting critics to see the work when it’s here. Would be great if you could come along to that debate! Email me for more details.
Hannah and Thomas both implicitly address the impact of low population density in rural areas, at least as far as ‘traditional’ media are concerned.
Full disclosure: I work for Beaford Arts, which serves rural north Devon. Our regional weekly, the North Devon Journal, regularly supports our programme with previews. But – along the same lines as Thomas notes – the proportion of the NDJ’s readership interested in a detailed critique of the work would make even the cost of the ink unviable.
That leaves three potential sources: national media (which take time – The Drum wasn’t always featured so regularly in certain places); specialist online media (Hannah rightly acknowledges those stepping up to the plate); and social media.
For me, the third is the most fecund – but currently the least potent. Because we in the sector know both what we’re up against and those of us who are up against it, social media commentaries tend to oscillate between obsequiousness and silence.
I’m as guilty as anyone. I can think of a couple of events I’ve attended in the past few months which have underwhelmed comprehensively. Yet rather than write even a 140-character critique I’ve held my peace either to avoid offence to those I know, or to avoid exacerbating already-poor sales.
There’s a balance to be struck between supporting the regional sector practically and helping it to flourish artistically. The (unwarranted) national silence means that responsibility for both must fall to those of us who work here. I’m not sure that we’ve yet balanced those duties.
(And as a postscript, neither can we overlook the sheer bloody size of the region. Thomas’s response is reasoned, expert, and incisive but not wholly accurate. A number of the SW’s rural schemes operate far from even the smallest city, yet offer programmes much less “tedious and repetitive” than large town/small city venues elsewhere. I’m not attempting petty point-scoring here; merely taking the opportunity to demonstrate one of the many issues we face.)
Thanks for reading these pieces and commenting. Mine is an extract that ‘nom de strip’ selected from a full piece I wrote for my blog: http://hannahsilva.wordpress.com/2012/05/29/where-are-the-south-west-theatre-critics/
- please do read the original as I didn’t have the opportunity to check or revise this extract before it was published here or in the print version.
Thinking about Katrina’s point – Yes, I think there are some schemes like this, I’m pretty sure TR2/Theatre Royal run a scheme that offers free tickets to young people and encourages reviewing. I know they have a Facebook page for it, but can’t find the info via googling. And I think it would help to join up the existing schemes and do more within the theatre sector. But of course, then we need those young people to stick around and start publishing. Similar schemes that are not age restricted might be good too. And I’m sure the universities could do more to force their students to see work and write about it. (‘force’ not ‘encourage’ – as encouraging doesn’t seem to work and if these students want to have a career making theatre they HAVE to go and watch it)
Like Mark, I’d also like to pick up on Thomas’ comment about ‘safe rep’. I’ve found it much easier to tour my show ‘Opposition’ to regional theatres: Queen’s Theatre Barnstaple, ARC Stockton on Tees, Barbican theatre plymouth, Bike Shed theatre Exeter, lincoln drill hall studio, Pulse Festival, Ashley Wood festival etc – and it has taken me far longer to get a run in London (which I have finally succeeded in doing: 2 weeks at Ovalhouse in Nov) – I’ve also struggled with Bristol. – Bristol is brilliant at looking after those theatre makers who are based in the city. We need a similar ethos in Exeter and Plymouth etc. So in my experience regional theatres are more risk-taking, and all those I toured to are keen to book my next show too.
I also agree with Mark’s point about not wanting to write negatively about work. It’s hard enough to get the work on here without people in the region posting negative criticism. However this is an issue. If our local critics only write about work they like, or never come out and say what they really think, then it’s hard to respect their opinions as an audience member.
Sorry this response is an unstructured as my original blog
- But to pick up on the social media point… Social media and blogging etc is our biggest weapon as regional theatre makers. Years ago I had my first invitation to perform in London through posting work on myspace (I did say years ago:) Recently I’ve been asked to write for Devon Life and Exeunt. My blog has been mentioned in ‘Noises Off’ – the Guardian blog a couple of times. I’ve also been invited by Maddy Costa to be involved in ‘Dialogue’ http://www.welcometodialogue.com/ – and through this I will work with an ‘embedded critic’ for my next project ‘Hunger’ – perhaps an alternatively way of profiling the work in the absence of reviews. – All as a result of ranting about theatre on my blog and engaging in a couple of twitter discussions…
- And I totally agree with Thomas’ last comment. I’ve been based here for eight years. I’m a little tired of answering the question ‘what do you need?’ ‘how can we support you?’ etc. I’ve answered those questions, and I’m still fighting for the things I need (not money). I’ll be based in London for a few months from Sept as I have work there and no work here. It’ll be very interesting to discover the differences. I shall blog about it. http://hannahsilva.wordpress.com
- Please come and discuss all these issues at ‘Devoted and Disgruntled’ on the 17th July at TR2 in Plymouth. Book here: http://www.devotedanddisgruntled.com/events/dd-roadshow-plymouth/
Pingback: Devoted and Disgruntled, Plymouth | Nom de Strip
Hi Hannah & Thomas. This is a really improtant issue and one I get asked about a lot by artists who are desperate for their work to be profiled and therfore part of a wider debate.
The question of who writes and why is incredibly important: Thomas has reviewed work at Arnolfini in a thoughtful, informed and critical way. However other reviewers who come to the work, particularly performance that is more experimental or challenging or unusual, often do so without an understanding of context or form, which can result in what this excellent blog refers to as ‘Category Error’ http://weirdypapoose.blogspot.co.uk/2011/11/category-error.html
While every audience member is entitled to his or her opinion, coming to a piece with a fixed idea of what theatre should be or do can be quite damaging if those thoughts are then received as an expert opinion by the wider audience. – particularly if that is the only review of the piece, which is often the case here.
Pingback: Devoted and Disgruntled and Devon | mark wallace's blog